Hire a Dedicated Developer in India: A Buyer's Guide
Hire a dedicated developer in India: engagement models, what $1,500 to $2,000 a month should buy, real time zone overlap by region, code ownership, red flags.
To hire a dedicated developer in India, first decide whether you need full-time, part-time, or fixed-scope help. Then check four things before you sign: software the developer's team has shipped, who reviews their code, how many working hours overlap with yours, and whether your code and accounts stay in your company's name from day one.
TL;DR: Choose the engagement model first, then judge the team on shipped work, code review, overlap, and ownership. A 10:00 to 19:00 IST day overlaps about 8.5 hours with the UAE, 4.5 to 5.5 with the UK, 2.5 to 3.5 with Sydney, and almost none with the US unless someone shifts hours.
This guide covers the decisions to make before you sign, the overlap you'll actually get, and the warning signs that a "dedicated developer" is a bench resource shared across five clients. If you're hiring for a FastAPI codebase specifically, our technical vetting guide covers the code questions in depth.
Which engagement model fits your work?
Pick the model before you pick the person. A dedicated developer suits an ongoing roadmap; part-time suits a live product that needs steady care; fixed scope suits work with a clear finish line. If you can't write down at least three months of work, don't start with a full-time hire.
| Model | Hours | Fits |
|---|---|---|
| Dedicated developer | Full time on your product, about 160 hours a month | An ongoing roadmap and a backlog that won't run out |
| Part-time developer | About 80 hours a month, on fixed days | A live product that needs steady work, not a sprint |
| Fixed scope | A defined piece of work, priced before starting | A feature, a migration, or an MVP |
A dedicated developer with nothing to do costs exactly the same as one who's busy. If what you need is an MVP built, a fixed-price project is usually simpler; our MVP cost guide covers that route. Many products do one, then the other: a project to launch, then a developer for the roadmap after.
What should $1,500 to $2,000 a month include?
Our dedicated developers cost $1,500 to $2,000 a month for full-time work on one product. Whoever you hire from, at that rate you should be able to get the following in writing. If a vendor won't commit to these, the low price is hiding something.
- One named developer on your product, not a rotating cast.
- Code review by someone else on every pull request. A developer approving their own work isn't review.
- Daily written updates and a regular call inside your overlap hours.
- Work in your repositories, through pull requests you can see.
- Room to change direction when priorities shift, without renegotiating the contract.
Ask what's excluded, too. Cloud hosting, third-party licences, and design work are usually billed separately, and it's better to know that in week one than in month three.
How do you check a developer before you sign?
Look at software the team has built and still runs, then ask the developer to walk you through a piece of it. A live product tells you more than a résumé; a 30-minute walkthrough of what broke and what they'd change tells you more than a coding test.
For example, the products on our work page include NoteTube, an AI learning platform on web, iOS, Android, a Chrome extension, and an MCP server, and GymFast, a gym management platform with a web dashboard and three apps. Ask any vendor for the same thing: something live you can open, and the person who worked on it.
Good questions for the walkthrough: what was the hardest bug, how was it found, and how would they know if it came back? Developers who shipped the work answer with specifics, such as a log line, a test, or an alert. People repeating a sales deck answer with technology names. For a deeper list of review checks and red flags in code, see the vetting guide.
How much time zone overlap will you actually get?
A standard IST working day runs 10:00 to 19:00 at UTC+5:30, and India doesn't use daylight saving. Against a 09:00 to 18:00 local day, that gives about 8.5 hours with the UAE, 4.5 to 5.5 with the UK, 2.5 to 3.5 with Sydney, and essentially none with the US.
| Your region (09:00 to 18:00 local) | Overlap with 10:00 to 19:00 IST | How work tends to flow |
|---|---|---|
| UAE (UTC+4) | About 8.5 hours, all year | Your 09:00 to 17:30 is our 10:30 to 19:00 |
| UK | About 4.5 hours in GMT, 5.5 in BST | Standup in your morning, a written update before you log off |
| Sydney | About 3.5 hours in AEST, 2.5 in AEDT | Your afternoon is our morning; work lands before your next day |
| US East | None in winter, about 30 minutes in summer | Written by default; any call needs one side to shift hours |
| US West | None | Written updates and recorded walkthroughs, plus a shifted call if you need one |
The seasons don't line up. UK clocks go forward on the last Sunday in March and back on the last Sunday in October (GOV.UK). US daylight saving runs from the second Sunday of March to the first Sunday of November (NIST). In New South Wales, it starts on 4 October 2026 and ends on 4 April 2027 (NSW Government).
So is a US client a bad fit? Not necessarily, but be honest about the shape. With no natural overlap, the work runs on writing: daily updates, recorded walkthroughs, and tickets clear enough to act on without a call. If you need live calls, agree up front which side shifts its hours and on which days. Our India page has more on how we set this up.
How do you stay in control of the code and accounts?
Keep everything in your organisation from day one: repositories, cloud accounts, app store accounts, domains, and credentials. Add the developer as a member and remove them when they leave. If the code lives in a vendor's repository until "handover", you don't own it yet.
Then make review mechanical rather than a promise. On GitHub, a protected branch can require a set number of approving reviews before anyone merges into it, and with that rule on, collaborators can only push to the branch through an approved pull request (GitHub Docs). Turn it on for your main branch.
Three more terms worth writing into the contract:
- A definition of done for each task: tested, reviewed, deployed to staging.
- A notice period both ways, so neither side is trapped.
- Documentation as you go, so knowledge doesn't leave with the developer.
A communication rhythm that survives time zones
Most offshore arrangements that fail do so on communication, not code. Agree the rhythm on day one and write it down. Written updates survive time zones; calls don't, which matters most for the UK afternoon, Sydney's next morning, and every US working day.
- A daily written update at the end of the developer's day: done, next, blocked.
- One fixed call inside your overlap, kept short.
- One place for tasks, where every ticket links to its pull request.
- Recorded walkthroughs for larger features, so people outside the overlap can review on their own time.
- A named contact on your side who answers within a working day. A blocked developer is an expensive one.
Red flags that point to a shared resource
Watch for answers that avoid specifics. If a vendor can't name the developer, show where the code will live, or say who reviews it, you're probably buying a shared resource rather than a dedicated one.
- The company can't name the developer before you sign.
- Hours are "flexible", with no fixed overlap or written rhythm.
- Code lives in the vendor's repositories until "handover".
- Nobody other than the author reviews pull requests.
- Updates are verbal only.
- Every question about past work turns into a pitch.
What should the first month look like?
Plan the first month so you can judge the fit fast. One small real task shipped in week one shows whether access and communication work; a reviewed larger task in week two shows code quality; normal roadmap work in weeks three and four shows pace.
- Week one: access to repositories and environments, a product walkthrough, and one small task shipped.
- Week two: a larger task, reviewed by your team and the developer's reviewer.
- Weeks three and four: normal roadmap work, then a review call.
By the end of the month, you should know whether quality, communication, and pace are what you need. If they aren't, the notice period is there for a reason.
Full-stack or specialist?
A full-stack developer covers the web front end, the backend, and often a mobile app on the same API, which suits a small product with one developer. If most of your roadmap sits in one area, a specialist fits better, for example a React Native developer for a mobile-heavy product.
FAQ
Should the developer be on my payroll or the vendor's?
Usually the vendor's. Employing someone in India directly means local contracts, payroll, and compliance you'd have to handle yourself. Through a vendor, you get one invoice, a replacement if the fit is wrong, and a reviewer behind the developer. Either way, the code and accounts should be yours.
How many hours of overlap do I need with a remote developer?
Two to three hours is enough for a short daily call plus time to unblock questions, provided updates are written. With the UAE or UK you'll have more than that. With the US you'll have almost none, so agree which side shifts its hours before you start.
What happens if the developer leaves partway through?
If the code, tickets, and documentation live in your accounts, a replacement can pick up from the repository and the written history. Ask the vendor how they handle a handover and how long a replacement takes, and keep a notice period in the contract so there's overlap between the two people.
Need a developer who works only on your product? Hire a full-stack developer from our team, meet them before you decide, and agree the overlap and review rules in writing on day one.